On Testing

Written on November 14 2016 at 17:06 and updated on May 03 2011 at 15:02
I've spent quite a bit of time in the second half of 2010 thinking about testing code. I suspect there's a lot more thinking yet to be done before I have anything particularly substantive to say. Unit Testing - Test::Unit vs. Rspec vs. ... well, all the others - ultimately it doesn't matter, the key is to be able to express yourself fluently and easily, without intertia - some may argue that the language ('bdd') is important, I don't believe it makes that much different to a reasonably experienced developer - nested contexts are interesting, and I find them useful, but I'm not convinced they lead to better tests - matchers are interesting too - both matcher-based testing and nested contexts are now available independently, this is probably a good thing. Cucumber - encourages you to 'just write', removes some of the inertia - the split into 'features', 'steps' and 'support' exacerbates a placement/repetition problem that I think already exists. The real testing questions --------------------------- - what's the functionality that i'm trying to test - how do I exercise that functionality (the "action") - how do I get the system ready (the "setup") - and in both of those cases, what already exists to do that, and are those existing abstractions/encapsulations appropriate in this case - existing methods - existing contexts with identical/similar setups - is the test a new side-effect of something that's already tested, or is it new functionality? - what other tests does this test belong with? (- what's the right level to write this test?)