Eleanor,

I read your blog post about conference speaking, and had a few thoughts. I hope you don’t mind if I jot them down.

Firstly, I’m sure everyone can sympathise with the desire to go to lots of conferences, and how financial constraints often limit our ability to indulge ourselves in this way.

It’s probably true that a good chunk of conference attendees have their conference travel subsidised to whatever extent by their employers. They’re pretty lucky to have employers who are willing to do that, since we all know (having blagged it as employees ourselves) that there’s very little value flowing back to the employer¹.

But bear in mind, they also have to put up with all the shit that comes with being an employee in order to get those perks. So it’s not all gravy.

Despite this, a surprising number of people pay their own way. Over the years I’ve personally paid hundreds if not thousands of pounds/dollars, just for hotels and flights to conferences, even when I was speaking. My own money. Money I could’ve spent on cake.

Conferences are an expensive habit, so I don’t really blame your audacious approach to satisfying it.

It’s all for a good cause

Years ago, a very generous person once gave me $50 for maintaining the engines plugin². I was delighted. It was totally unexpected, and I had to set up the donation mechanism because it had never occurred to me that people might reward development in that way.

I never earned anything from it beyond that Grant, except immeasurable experience and a nice email from DHH with the subject line: “I repent”.

Your turn. Did you know that people - strangers - have donated well over two thousand dollars to date towards your attendance of conferences. That’s pretty incredible.

Perhaps your situation isn’t as bad as you think?

Slide 1: “DO. NOT. BLINK.”

I’m also a bit confused about how you feel your presentation style relates to all this. You’re right - everyone takes time to find their voice and hone their style. The first presentations I gave were awful, and I’m not sure I’m that much better now.

However, it sounds like you’re saying that your presentations are not intended to be digested at the conference. Am I reading you right? What you’re actually aiming for is some kind of beat-poet stream of consciousness veering whimsically around while the slides perform a dissonant peripheral assault? I mean… really? Really?

But more than this, despite acknowledging that audiences find your style hard to engage with, and that your slides aren’t really designed for audiences to understand, you think that they should still donate money so that you can physically deliver your presentation mind-bomb in person? The presentation that’s too-hard-to-follow-at-a-conference-so-they-should-just-try-to-decipher-it-on-slideshare-instead?

My eyebrow, Ma’am, is significantly raised.

My suggestions

Forgive me if this seems impertinent, but I have some suggestions³.

• Start practicing writing about your code - now. It’s cheaper than conferences, better for the environment, and will improve everyone’s experience of your work.
• If you must sate your desire for an audience:
  • talk at other user groups; it’s cheap and you’ll get to iterate faster
  • do whatever you can to gain the favour of an employer who will be willing to stump up the requisite funds, and accept whatever constraints (practical, geographical, ideological) that they require in return for doing so.
• Campaign for cheaper conferences where attendees have more input into the program. Obviously this is an idea I care about. If you believe that attendees value your presence, then urge conference organisers to give attendees a direct say in who talks, and influence on how their ticket price is put to work. Maybe if you can convince one to stop printing glossy brochures or tacky t-shirts, they can use the money to bring you over? We can but dream.
• Oh - yes - don’t cram so much code into your slides.

On that last point: as both an audience member and a conference organiser⁴ I can assure you that while the performance is certainly memorable, I spent a considerable amount of time in the presentation trying to figure out what I should be paying attention to, and reading the slides afterwards without any context or obvious threading is - to be honest - worse than the live show.

You say in your post that you think this is providing more value, but it’s not. I don’t doubt that it’s the culmination of months of work and research, but part of your job as a presenter is to distill that into key insights and digestible chunks. Nobody gets refreshed by drinking from a firehose.

In other words: focus a little less on cementing your genius for posterity, and a little more into genuinely communicating with your audience.

Eleanor,

I read your blog post about conference speaking, and had a few thoughts. I hope you don’t mind if I jot them down.

Firstly, I’m sure everyone can sympathise with the desire to go to lots of conferences, and how financial constraints often limit our ability to indulge ourselves in this way.

It’s probably true that a good chunk of conference attendees have their conference travel subsidised to whatever extent by their employers. They’re pretty lucky to have employers who are willing to do that, since we all know (having blagged it as employees ourselves) that there’s very little value flowing back to the employer¹.

But bear in mind, they also have to put up with all the shit that comes with being an employee in order to get those perks. So it’s not all gravy.

Despite this, a surprising number of people pay their own way. Over the years I’ve personally paid hundreds if not thousands of pounds/dollars, just for hotels and flights to conferences, even when I was speaking. My own money. Money I could’ve spent on cake.

Conferences are an expensive habit, so I don’t really blame your audacious approach to satisfying it.

It’s all for a good cause

Years ago, a very generous person once gave me $50 for maintaining the engines plugin². I was delighted. It was totally unexpected, and I had to set up the donation mechanism because it had never occurred to me that people might reward development in that way.

I never earned anything from it beyond that Grant, except immeasurable experience and a nice email from DHH with the subject line: “I repent”.

Your turn. Did you know that people - strangers - have donated well over two thousand dollars to date towards your attendance of conferences. That’s pretty incredible.

Perhaps your situation isn’t as bad as you think?

Slide 1: “DO. NOT. BLINK.”

I’m also a bit confused about how you feel your presentation style relates to all this. You’re right - everyone takes time to find their voice and hone their style. The first presentations I gave were awful, and I’m not sure I’m that much better now.

However, it sounds like you’re saying that your presentations are not intended to be digested at the conference. Am I reading you right? What you’re actually aiming for is some kind of beat-poet stream of consciousness veering whimsically around while the slides perform a dissonant peripheral assault? I mean… really? Really?

But more than this, despite acknowledging that audiences find your style hard to engage with, and that your slides aren’t really designed for audiences to understand, you think that they should still donate money so that you can physically deliver your presentation mind-bomb in person? The presentation that’s too-hard-to-follow-at-a-conference-so-they-should-just-try-to-decipher-it-on-slideshare-instead?

My eyebrow, Ma’am, is significantly raised.

My suggestions

Forgive me if this seems impertinent, but I have some suggestions³.

• Start practicing writing about your code - now. It’s cheaper than conferences, better for the environment, and will improve everyone’s experience of your work.
• If you must sate your desire for an audience:
  • talk at other user groups; it’s cheap and you’ll get to iterate faster
  • do whatever you can to gain the favour of an employer who will be willing to stump up the requisite funds, and accept whatever constraints (practical, geographical, ideological) that they require in return for doing so.
• Campaign for cheaper conferences where attendees have more input into the program. Obviously this is an idea I care about. If you believe that attendees value your presence, then urge conference organisers to give attendees a direct say in who talks, and influence on how their ticket price is put to work. Maybe if you can convince one to stop printing glossy brochures or tacky t-shirts, they can use the money to bring you over? We can but dream.
• Oh - yes - don’t cram so much code into your slides.

On that last point: as both an audience member and a conference organiser⁴ I can assure you that while the performance is certainly memorable, I spent a considerable amount of time in the presentation trying to figure out what I should be paying attention to, and reading the slides afterwards without any context or obvious threading is - to be honest - worse than the live show.

You say in your post that you think this is providing more value, but it’s not. I don’t doubt that it’s the culmination of months of work and research, but part of your job as a presenter is to distill that into key insights and digestible chunks. Nobody gets refreshed by drinking from a firehose.

In other words: focus a little less on cementing your genius for posterity, and a little more into genuinely communicating with your audience.

I got into a conversation about Typekit on Twitter the other day, and Paul Battley hinted that he didn’t really see the point:

[snip 'tweet' cannot be found]

Typekit doesn’t seem to work on Chrome-based browsers, or Mobile Safari (so that means the iPhone, and probably Android). That’s a shame, but I expect that Typekit will address the issue, if only for the desktop-bound browsers, but Paul’s comment about legibility got me thinking.

I suspect what Paul thinks is important is getting to the meat of a site - the actual information - without any unnecessary hinderances. It’s a goal I can fully support.

It’s Web 2.0, right?

Good websites let you consume their data in any way you like. This one has an atom feed, but you can also slurpt the HTML and do what you like with that. All of the content is available individually (or just the text, or even the raw snip), and the full posts are in the feed, so you’re genuinely able to consume this site in any way you please. However, if you actually visit directly in a browser, I have an opportunity to add an extra dimension to that experience, aesthetically. That’s what Typekit assists with.

It’s certainly easy to produce a difficult-to-read version of this content using Typekit, and I may have achieved just that here. I think the point is that this is my domain (in both senses of the word), and it’s employed as a medium for expressing myself, both intellectually and visually.